JerryRigEverything Exposed Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” System.


In the latest chapter of the ongoing Tesla saga, YouTuber JerryRigEverything dropped a bombshell on Twitter that reverberated through the automotive world. A mere screenshot from Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) manual unveiled a stark contradiction: while the system is marketed as “full self-driving,” drivers are instructed to “keep your hands on the steering wheel at all times.” Cue the collective outrage and bewilderment.

The Mask Slips: Exposing Tesla’s FSD Farce

JerryRigEverything’s revelation laid bare the deception lurking beneath Tesla’s glossy marketing facade. How can a system flaunting the lofty title of “full self-driving” demand such manual intervention? It’s akin to purchasing a “self-cleaning” vacuum cleaner only to find out you still need to push it around yourself.

The irony couldn’t be more palpable: shelling out a hefty $12,000 for a technology that falls embarrassingly short of its own name. The Twitterverse exploded with incredulity, echoing JerryRigEverything’s sentiment of incredulous disbelief.

Tesla’s Deafening Silence: Dodging Accountability?

While the internet buzzed with speculation and criticism, Tesla’s response was conspicuously absent. Instead of addressing the glaring inconsistency head-on, the company opted for the age-old tactic of silence. Is this a calculated evasion of accountability, or simply a strategic delay? Either way, Tesla’s reticence only fuels the flames of skepticism.

Loyalty Tested: Defenders vs. Dissenters

In the aftermath of JerryRigEverything’s bombshell, battle lines were drawn on Twitter. Tesla loyalists rushed to defend the company’s honor, downplaying the significance of the FSD debacle. They argued that the system is still in its infancy, a work in progress meant to assist rather than replace drivers entirely. But such blind allegiance smacks of naivety, if not outright denial.

Public opinion on Tesla’s FSD system is mixed, with some people expressing excitement and enthusiasm for the technology’s potential, while others raise concerns about its safety, ethics, and regulatory issues.

Supporters of Tesla’s FSD system argue that it has the potential to transform the way we travel, making driving safer and more efficient. They point to the system’s advanced features, such as the ability to recognize and respond to traffic signals, pedestrians, and other vehicles, as evidence of its capabilities.

Additionally, some Tesla owners have shared their positive experiences with the FSD system, arguing that it has significantly improved their driving experience and safety. They have pointed out that the manual instructions to keep hands on the wheel and reports of suspensions for looking away from the road are not indicative of the system’s overall capabilities.

Others have pointed out that Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD systems have faced a number of issues since the company added the ability to use cabin cameras to monitor drivers. Some users have reported being suspended from using the systems if they look away from the road or grab their phones.

Additionally, some critics have raised ethical concerns about self-driving technology, such as the potential for accidents and the need to program the systems to make difficult moral decisions. They argue that these issues need to be addressed before self-driving technology can be safely and widely adopted.

However, others have criticized Tesla for failing to address the issues highlighted by JerryRigEverything and other critics. They have argued that the company should be more transparent about the limitations of its self-driving technology and take steps to ensure that it is being used safely and responsibly.

Proponents Praise Potential: Ignoring the Elephant in the Room

Proponents of Tesla’s FSD system paint a rosy picture of a future where driving becomes safer and more efficient. They extol the virtues of its advanced features, from recognizing traffic signals to navigating pedestrians with ease. But in their eagerness to champion progress, they conveniently overlook the inconvenient truth: Tesla’s FSD is far from the flawless panacea it claims to be.

Critics Cry Foul: Ethical Quagmires and Regulatory Quandaries

For every Tesla cheerleader, there’s a skeptic armed with a laundry list of grievances. From ethical dilemmas surrounding self-driving technology to regulatory hurdles hindering its progress, critics spare no punches in their takedown of Tesla’s FSD utopia.

The Regulatory Rigmarole: A Convenient Scapegoat?

While Tesla cites regulatory constraints as the primary roadblock to FSD perfection, skeptics aren’t buying it. Yes, navigating the labyrinthine landscape of regulatory compliance is no easy feat. But to attribute all of Tesla’s shortcomings to regulatory red tape is disingenuous at best, deceptive at worst.

Are there any regulations specific to Tesla’s FSD system?

In the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) wields considerable power over the development and deployment of self-driving technology, doling out guidelines and exemptions to existing safety standards. Meanwhile, individual states have carved out their own patchwork of regulations, complicating matters for companies like Tesla eager to test and roll out their autonomous systems. Despite efforts at the federal level to streamline regulations with the SELF DRIVE Act, progress remains stalled, leaving the regulatory landscape mired in uncertainty and inconsistency.

What are the specific concerns around Tesla’s FSD safety issues?

The safety of Tesla’s FSD system has ignited a firestorm of controversy, with critics voicing a litany of concerns:

  • Technology Limitations: Despite its advancements, Tesla’s FSD system falls short of true “full self-driving,” necessitating driver attention and potentially leading to confusion and accidents.
  • Safety Standards: Critics argue that existing safety standards fail to adequately address the unique challenges of self-driving technology, leaving systems like Tesla’s FSD vulnerable to mishaps.
  • Training and Education: Experts warn of the lack of proper training for drivers using self-driving technology, underscoring the need for comprehensive education to ensure safe and effective use.
  • Transparency Deficit: Skeptics raise alarms over Tesla’s opacity regarding FSD’s safety and performance, demanding greater transparency and data disclosure.
  • Ethical Dilemmas: The ethical implications of self-driving technology, including Tesla’s FSD, loom large, with experts calling for robust programming to navigate moral quandaries.
  • Regulatory Red Tape: Critics lambaste the regulatory framework governing self-driving tech, arguing that current regulations fall short of ensuring safe deployment and advocating for more stringent oversight.

How does Tesla ensure driver attentiveness during FSD usage?

Tesla employs various mechanisms to ensure driver attentiveness during FSD usage:

  • Torque Sensors: The steering wheel is equipped with torque sensors, detecting when the driver’s hands stray. If prolonged absence is detected, warnings escalate, ultimately halting the vehicle.
  • Visual and Auditory Alerts: Tesla’s FSD system issues subtle yet effective visual and auditory alerts, nudging drivers to maintain their grip on the wheel.
  • Autopilot Nag: The Autopilot feature incorporates a persistent “nag” system, continuously reminding drivers to stay engaged with the road ahead.
  • Emergency Braking: As a failsafe measure, Tesla’s FSD system can autonomously engage emergency braking if a potential collision is detected, mitigating risks posed by driver distraction.

Peeling Back the Layers: The Truth Behind the Smoke and Mirrors

Beneath Tesla’s glossy exterior lies a web of contradictions, half-truths, and broken promises. While the allure of self-driving technology is undeniable, it’s time to strip away the veneer of deception and confront the inconvenient reality: Tesla’s FSD is a far cry from the promised land of full autonomy.

Overall, Tesla’s FSD system is designed to assist drivers rather than replace them entirely. The company emphasizes that drivers must remain attentive and engaged while using the system, and it has implemented several features to promote driver attentiveness and safety.